Professor Ruth Morgan
Ruth Morgan is Professor of Crime and Forensic Science at UCL (University College London) and Director of the UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences. She is Vice Dean (Interdisciplinarity Entrepreneurship) in the UCL Faculty of Engineering Sciences and Co-Director of the UCL Arista Institute.
She is an interdisciplinary researcher, fascinated by the intersections between disciplines, and always seeking to find the answers to questions in ways that hold both science and society together.
Her research addresses critical questions in two main areas: the accurate interpretation of forensic science evidence, and also the challenges for interdisciplinarity, creativity and engagement across disciplines and between the university and industry, business and government.
Ruth is a World Economic Forum Young Scientist (Class of 2019). She is a speaker and commentator on forensic science, and science in policy, and a passionate advocate for problem based research that has an impact in the real world.
EVIDENCE IS NOT ENOUGH
Forensic science isn’t always irrefutable. At the heart of our research is the question ‘what does the evidence mean?’. Forensic science has developed staggering abilities to accurately detect a trace, classify what it is and establish who it has come from. But at the moment we don’t always have the data that we need to always understand what it means. It's a big complex challenge, but if we can create an innovative and creative environment for pioneering research, we can contribute to changing the world!
Global challenges need broad, diverse, creative thinking that brings perspectives from the arts and sciences together along with the insights from industry, business and government. Building bridges between different disciplines and different sectors takes time and in many cases requires a re-imagining of a challenge and the existing frameworks that we operate within. Asking questions like 'what if?' are often the best starting point. Being willing to ask these types of questions creates opportunities to imagine alternatives to the current status quo. These types of questions also help us to bring different ways of 'seeing' and 'doing' together, to explore, learn, unlearn and re-learn together, and begin to find the innovative creative solutions that we're searching for.
"What if I told you that forensic science isn't always the open and shut case we often think it is?"
The dangers of misinterpreted forensic science evidence. Forensic science is a technological success story, we can now identify smaller amounts of trace material more accurately and more quickly than ever before. But to understand what the evidence means we need to understand the 'when' and the 'how' as well as the 'what' and the 'who'...